Christopher Combs: A Firsthand Account of the FBI’s Response to 9/11 at the Pentagon

Written by Gabriel Kranz-Danet

LEAP students recently had the opportunity to host former FBI Special Agent in Charge Christopher Combs at the Walker Education Center! Several students had attended a similar talk with the World Affairs Council earlier in the semester, and we were all eager to hear from him again.

To start off the evening, we enjoyed a reception complete with delicious food and plenty of excited conversation! During the reception many attendees visited the Sam Houston Memorial Museum’s Annual Photo Contest. Several community members were able to attend, including Ken Holland, Nancy Ormsby, and Sam Houston Memorial Museum‘s own Megan Buro. We were thrilled to have attendance from Caney Creek High School’s Student World Affairs Council Club, whom we have seen at many WAC events!

Drawing on his years in federal law enforcement, Combs offered an inside look at the confusion surrounding the initial response, the challenges investigators faced, and the lasting consequences of that day. His enthusiasm, personable attitude, and remarkable storytelling ability made the presentation especially engaging.

Combs began his FBI career in counterintelligence, primarily working on Russian espionage, before transitioning to a rapid-response counterterrorism task force. At the time of the attacks, he had been with the Bureau for only five years. He described himself as simply “a guy doing the job,” but the events that followed would become some of the defining experiences of his career.

One detail that stood out was how little anyone initially understood about what had happened. Combs recalled that he did not initially believe a commercial aircraft had struck the Pentagon. His first suspicion was a truck bomb. For nearly 15 minutes, investigators struggled to understand what they were facing. Hearing him describe those first moments was a reminder that those responding had no clear picture of what was happening or what might come next.

Combs described a scene that drew thousands of first responders and investigators. A total of 183 people were killed at the Pentagon. Investigators recovered 113 bodies, which Combs defined as a torso or larger, while more than 3,000 human remains were ultimately collected and identified.

Despite the willingness of so many people to help, some volunteers had to be turned away because they lacked the necessary training and were unintentionally hindering operations. Combs emphasized that remaining calm, organized, and focused was essential. Cooperation among local police, fire departments, FEMA, the FBI, and Pentagon personnel made the recovery possible.

He compared the undertaking to the familiar saying, “How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.” The work could only be accomplished by breaking an overwhelming situation into smaller, manageable tasks. For students interested in law enforcement, this offered a practical lesson in preparation and teamwork.

Combs also discussed challenges investigators encountered beyond the recovery itself. Some individuals attempted to impersonate emergency personnel to gain access to restricted areas, requiring stricter procedures for verifying response teams. Evidence collection also had to happen quickly, as important evidence could be lost amid the destruction. Investigators had to balance urgency with careful investigative procedures.

He also spoke about the media’s coverage of major incidents, explaining that early reporting is often inaccurate. Combs avoids publicly identifying terrorists and mass shooters whenever possible, believing attention should remain on victims and the personnel responding to these events.

Throughout the presentation, Combs emphasized that repetition breeds excellence. Preparation, discipline, and teamwork are essential when circumstances become unpredictable. He also spoke candidly about the demands of federal law enforcement, including frequent travel and time away from home. Following the Pentagon response, he was immediately involved in the anthrax investigation and recalled earning a reputation as “the crisis guy.”

For me, one of the most valuable aspects of the evening was hearing these experiences from someone who had actually lived through them. Combs’s enthusiasm, storytelling ability, and passion for his profession made an already significant subject that much more engaging. His presentation showed that law enforcement requires more than investigative knowledge; it demands adaptability, cooperation, and a willingness to serve others under difficult circumstances. For LEAP students considering careers in public service, hearing that perspective firsthand offered a meaningful look at the responsibilities of the profession.

Barristers, Bailiffs, and Ballots

Day Two of the American Moot Court Association’s South Texas Regional Tournament in Fort Worth offered SHSU’s moot court students a valuable opportunity to learn from some of the nation’s top competitors, become more familiar with Texas A&M University’s School of Law, and help out as needed.

Although none of SHSU’s teams remained in the competition, the students stayed for the day to support the tournament. The day featured four rounds: the Sweet Sixteen, quarterfinals, semifinals, and finals.

The bracket for the day looked like this:

  • 1 / 16: UC Berkely (Tran and Vel) against U of Incarnate Word (Boubel and Shah)
  • 2/15: Cal State–Long Beach (Sanzobrin and Khodjakhonova) against UT Arlington (Osei and Masood)
  • 3/14: UT Dallas (Das and Tsa) against TCU (Morvant and Addison)
  • 4/13: Baylor (Barrow and Alzarez) against UT Dallas (Elsadi and Baldazo)
  • 5/12: TCU (Cantrill and Bene) against Howard Payne University (Horton and Herrera)
  • 6/11: Baylor (Smith and Molinaro) against Howard Payne University (Sandlin and Mathis)
  • 7/10: Baylor (Beck and Homberg) against TCU (Caldwell and Grau)
  • 8/9: UNT (Rhoades and Ethridge) against UT Arlington (Nixon v. Thatraju)

In a couple of the rounds, a person dressed as a witch -this being Halloween- served as a judge.

After each round, members of the American Moot Court Association’s Board and staff from Texas A&M School of Law announced the winners and directed teams to their rooms for the next round.

We noticed that when teams lost, they tended to leave. We opted to stay, out of respect for the winners, and to assist as we could. Accordingly, we served as bailiffs throughout the day, helping keep the proceedings running smoothly. Every student served as a bailiff for at least one round, and most served for two. They also remained available to assist as coaches and in other capacities as needed.

Ryan Snow had the distinction of serving as bailiff for the championship round, held in Texas A&M’s courtroom. The final featured two outstanding teams: Aaron Tran and Nayan Vel of the University of California, Berkeley, and Anna Kate Beck and Maya Homberg of Baylor University.

The championship round featured a panel of five judges, many of whom brought extensive courtroom experience from both sides of the bench. Their collective experience provided a formidable audience for the finalists as they presented their arguments.

The final proved to be a closely contested affair.

After a hard-fought round, Baylor (Beck and Homberg) emerged victorious by a narrow margin, winning three ballots to two.

The top four competitors were gracious following the round. They even posed for a selfie together, and they also posed for photographers–which meant us, as the tournament didn’t have a designated photographer.

Despite the fact that all of SHSU’s competitors would have liked to have been competing on Saturday, it was a rewarding day.

The finalists were excellent, providing lessons for future competitions, and the judges’ questions were, for the most part, insightful and skilled.

Reata

After a full day of moot court, the SHSU group headed to Reata in downtown Fort Worth for dinner, where the restaurant’s distinctive Southwestern cuisine provided a fitting end to the day- and to the Fort Worth “vibe.” The group began with a starter sampler featuring an adventurous assortment of flavors, including polenta, quail, lamb fries, elk sausage, and tortillas.

The variety offered something a little different from the usual dinner fare and gave everyone a chance to sample several specialties.

The entrees were equally varied, ranging from fish and grilled chicken to chicken-fried steak, chile rellenos, Brussels sprouts, and polenta.

Everything was well received, but the chile rellenos proved to be a particular standout. Of course, no dinner would be complete without dessert, and Reata delivered on that front, too. The bread pudding crème brûlée and baked apple fritter served with ice cream were the evening’s clear favorites.

After a day of competition, service, and learning, the excellent meal provided a welcome opportunity for everyone to relax and enjoy one another’s company.

SHSU Moot Court Reaches Sweet Sixteen at UC San Diego

Written by Allie Plunk

On October 3rd and 4th, Sam Houston State University’s Moot Court Team had the incredible opportunity to compete in the Triton Tidal Invitational, hosted by the University of California–San Diego.

The first day consisted of three preliminary rounds, each with pre-assigned competitors and arguments. Interestingly, both of SHSU’s teams had one round arguing as Petitioner and two rounds arguing as Respondent, allowing each team to practice both sides of the case and adapt their arguments to different perspectives.

After each round, the teams had the chance to regroup, discuss feedback, and prepare for the next argument. Between rounds, we were also grateful to have snacks graciously provided by Stephanie Fors, which kept everyone fueled and ready to take on the next challenge!

Once the preliminary rounds concluded, we anxiously waited for the results. The standings would determine which teams would advance to the “Sweet Sixteen” and return on Sunday for another day of competition. Despite some skepticism about our chances (editor’s note: deserved skepticism), both of SHSU’s teams made it into the “Sweet Sixteen”! We were thrilled to have the opportunity to compete again and prove ourselves against some incredibly talented teams.

On Sunday, both teams returned to the courtroom ready to give it their all. Although neither team ultimately advanced to the quarter-finals, making it to the “Sweet Sixteen” was an accomplishment we were extremely proud of.

Beyond the results, the scrimmage gave our Moot Court teams something even more valuable: experience. Throughout the weekend, we were able to test our arguments in a competitive setting, identify some of our strongest points, uncover weaknesses in our cases, and come away with new ideas for strengthening our arguments. Every round gave us something to learn from, and we made it out with a much better understanding of what we can do to prepare for our next competition.

We are incredibly grateful to UC San Diego for hosting such a valuable and exciting scrimmage. We are proud of how far both teams made it and are looking forward to putting what we learned into practice. We are all excited for competition at Texas A&M on October 30th, and we can’t wait to see what the team accomplishes next!

Allie and the Tools of Success: Cherry Fritter, Notes, Ring Light, Notes, Coffee-Flavored Sugar from Seven Bros., Half-Hearted Smile, and More Notes

Building Future Leaders: Lessons from TX Supreme Court Justice James Sullivan

One of the advantages of attending SHSU is the opportunities afforded by the College of Criminal Justice, whose activities continue deep into the semester and even the summer. And so it was we found ourselves at lunch with 74 professionals from the legal and corrections community across the state of Texas–while listening to Texas Supreme Court Justice James Sullivan.

After an introduction by TDCJ General Counsel Stephanie Greger…

…Justice Sullivan highlighted five keys to leading teams of public servants.

  • Hire people smarter than you;
  • Grow a coaching tree;
  • Lead from the front;
  • Show people you care;
  • Build resilience.

He offered examples from his career, which he often shared tinged with traces of humor and a lot of common sense. He described his career as a government attorney and noted that while he didn’t earn as much as his private-practice counterparts (his wife, he says, “funds my government attorney hobby”), he was part of a team that produced successful leaders. This involves, he noted, disruption: good attorneys come in and work for the state; after a couple of years, they get better offers; and they move on to higher-paying jobs with greater influence. This creates turnover, but it is a product of a good strategy: hiring good people. And while those people leave eventually, they become coaches in their own spheres of influence, producing leaders that go on to serve.

Sullivan’s audience was on hand at SHSU to attend the Texas Criminal Justice Legal Conference, where leading practitioners were present to collaborate, think, and act to make Texas a better place. There were numerous attorneys present, including our friend Jack Choate and his excellent staff, and some new people we met, such as Rachelle White, Chief of Staff for TDCJ; Sean Groves, Deputy Executive Director of Texas Juvenile Justice; Eric Nichols, attorney at Butler Snow and Chairman of the Texas Board of Criminal Justice; and Wyvonne Long, Director of TDCJ Independent Office of Inmate Counsel. In short, there were a lot of people present from whom we could learn.

And learn we did! Between the conversations at the table and in the room, and the presentation by Justice Sullivan, we were exposed not only to tips for managing public servants, but also to the many careers in the law that also allow for public service.

LEAP Center Offers Mock LSAT, Other Pre-Law Programs

Sam Houston State University’s Center for Law, Engagement, And Politics offers numerous programs for those interested in legal careers. One of the most popular is our Mock LSAT, which is offered every fall (open to all) and spring (open to Pre-Law Society members).

This fall’s practice test occurred yesterday, with Olivia Discon and Michelle Moya coming up early on a Saturday to volunteer, student worker Gabila Flores working, Mike Yawn helping, and Jean Loveall leading the event. To accommodate the record-setting 125 people signed up, the bustling band set up the test in each of the room’s chairs while also providing flyers for a pre-law class in the spring (“Negotiation,” by Professor Chris Thompson).

As people began rolling in around 9am, guests were checked in, pencils and scantrons issued, and soon rules were covered.

Like the real test, the Mock LSAT is given in four sections, each 35 minutes. There are two Logical Reasoning sections, one Reading section, and one experimental section. Over the course of the morning, you could see the students’ energy fade a bit, as the test took its toll.

But the test is crucial in providing students with a baseline score so that they can work with LEAP Advisors to create a study plan for the real LSAT. This test– combined with Pre-Law Society activities, SHSU’s Legal Studies Minor, law-related guest speakers, workshops, field trips, Moot Court team, and study support in the form of scholarships–has helped SHSU become one of the top “Law School Feeders,” according to the Law School Admissions Council.

For those hoping to attend law school, there are many ways to get involved or learn more:

  • Schedule an appointment in Campus Connect, looking for the LEAP Center and Jean Loveall;
  • Follow the LEAP Center on Instagram (samhoustonleap), Facebook (SHSULEAP), or Linkedin (center-for-law-engagement-and-politics);
  • Sign up for the Mock LSAT or one of the many LEAP Center events;
  • Join the Pre-Law Society (prelawsocietyshsu on Instagram);
  • Create a law school admissions council account.

Getting to law school requires more work than the average post-graduate career or program of study, but with the right mindset and the willingness to take advantages of the resources that the LEAP Center offers–such as the Mock LSAT–law school is within your reach.

So You Want To Go To Law School…

At the beginning of each semester, the Pre-Law Society hosts an informational for those who are considering a future involving law school. For the past year and a half, the person leading this informational has been President Olivia Discon, and she again welcomed returning and prospective members.

She also did her usual effective job at describing the organization, highlighting upcoming events, and providing an overview of how to prepare for law school. Highlighting the organization, Discon stressed that the commitment is purposefully light: one official meeting per month. For those with more time and ambition, however, there are at least as many unofficial meetings–socials, mock LSATs, simulated law classes, live hearings, and guest speakers. The goal is to allow students to obtain the information they need but have the time necessary to study for the LSAT.

Indeed, this semester is likely to bring the usual share of events. These include:

  • September 17: “How to Get Into Law School,” with Admissions Deans from Texas Tech Law, University of Houston Law, and South Texas College of Law;
  • October 15: “Law at the Local Level”
  • November 19: Litigation in Action

Moreover, students will have the opportunity to try out for Moot Court (September 8), and if they make it, they will have a scrimmage (October 11-12) and a live tournament at Texas A&M Law. The organization and its parent department, LEAP, will also host a Mock LSAT (October 4), and will likely participate with the Student Legal & Mediation Services for conflict resolution seminars.

Perhaps the most useful information provided by the Pre-Law Society, however, is information pertaining to the law-school path. Throughout a student’s college career, the Pre-Law Society and the LEAP Center offers services that help students achieve their goals. This includes a lending library, scholarships for prep courses, law-school advising, and workshops.

To join PLS, new members pay $55 and returning members $25. Hard-working co-treasurers Jacob Wessels and Olivia McCaughan are available:

  • Tuesdays: 12:30-4:15
  • Wednesdays: 12-4
  • Thursdays: 2:00-4:15

They will also take dues from 5-6pm on September 17, the date of the first official meeting–and, importantly, the last date to pay dues.

After the informational meeting, students had the ability to chat one-on-one with Pre-Law Society Officers and members. Many students who joined us gained a hopeful view on their future from like-minded individuals.

To stay up to date and involved with upcoming events and information, you can follow our Instagram @prelawsocietyshsu. For more information and questions, please contact President, Ms. Olivia Discon, at Oliviadiscon@shsu.edu.