Mock LSAT Fall 2023

With the goal to find out how they will score on the LSAT, the Law School Admission Test, 37 SHSU students arrived on the Huntsville campus at 9:30 am on Saturday, October 21 to take a Mock LSAT. Assessing skills that are needed in law school and in the practice of law, the LSAT tests reading comprehension, analytical reasoning (sometimes called the Logic Games section), and logical reasoning (often termed the argumentative section). The LEAP Center offers a Mock LSAT at no charge in fall and spring semesters. In spring semesters, the Mock LSAT is limited to members of the SHSU Pre-Law Society.

Beginning with the August 2024 LSAT, the scored portion of the LSAT will consist of one Reading Comprehension section and two Logical Reasoning sections. Although the LSAT will continue to assess the analytical reasoning skills of LSAT takers, the LSAT will no longer use the format of Logic Games. Glen Stohr, lead instructional designer for prelaw programs at the education company Kaplan, opined that the second Logical Reasoning section “will include a heightened focus on word problems.”

There is no change in the structure of the LSAT between now and the June 2024 LSAT. The rigorous research conducted by lsac.org on the updating of the LSAT structural change as of August 2024 confirms that the new approach will not impact the overall LSAT scores. In addition, there will be no impact on the high correlation between LSAT scores and first-year law school success.

For more information or questions on the LSAT, the SHSU Pre-Law Society, or pre-law and law school advising, please contact Jean Loveall at jal072@shsu.edu.

Learning Law: the DA Way

McKenna Nonnenmann

For our mid-semester Pre-Law Society meeting, we had the honor of meeting Walker County District Attorney Will Durham. Born and raised in Huntsville, Durham carries a lot of pride for his hometown, and after a successful career as a personal injury attorney, followed his “calling” into public service.

Durham went through the structure of the District Attorney’s office, laying out the office’s divisions, responsibilities, staffing, and community involvement. This structure includes divisions for hot checks, protective orders, other misdemeanors, felonies, and victims assistance. The DA also uses interns from SHSU!

Durham also went in depth about some of the updates he made in the office, primarily making it as efficient as possible through the purchase of software and other technology. Now, for example, all discovery can be done electronically, saving costs in terms of copies (and trees). Moreover, Durham described his hiring philosophy, as the 3 Hs. His office wants lawyers/staff who are hungry, happy, and humble. In other words, he wants people who are eager to learn and work, will bring a good attitude to the office, and keep the focus on the public service–not themselves.

We were very grateful for Durham’s enlightening presentation, and I know many in the room are looking forward to applying for internships at the DA’s Office.

That was not the meeting’s only business, however. We also had our normal business matters, as well as elections!

Of our existing officers, VP of Finance (Emily Albright), VP of Membership (Nicole Erazo) and Historian (me!) were unopposed. VP of Marketing (Ariza Martinez) has only one meeting left before graduating, and Cinthia ran unopposed to succeed her. But for President and Secretary, there were challengers.

Olivia Discon came into the meeting as “interim president,” and she quickly distinguished herself as a hands-on officer, working to gain more involvement and greater campus and community participation. Yliana Santillan, a junior at SHSU, challenged her, with Ms. Discon emerging victorious.

Jasmine Crooks has served as Secretary for the past year, and she was challenged by Jessica Cuevas, who first joined the organization in the fall of 2021. Following their presentations, the vote showed Ms. Cuevas as the winner.

As always, we are grateful for all the people who decided to run for office and serve the organization, and we hope those who came up short in the elections will still find ways to contribute their considerable talents to the organization.

Most of all, we are grateful for Mr. Durham for his wonderful and educational presentation.

We’ll see everyone at the November 15 meeting!

Law Schools Ask: To ChatGPT or not to ChatGPT?

ChatGPT was released for public use on November 30, 2022. Because law firms are starting to use ChatGPT, some law schools, such as the University of Tulsa College of Law, are incorporating how to use ChatGPT ethically into their law school required legal research and writing courses.

There is no consensus among law schools, however, regarding the issue of allowing applicants to use ChatGPT in the law school admissions process, especially in the personal statement requirement. Dean Sue Ann McClellan, Assistant Dean of Admissions at the University of Memphis Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law, explains that the Memphis law school now asks applicants to acknowledge that the personal statement is their own work product and that the applicant did not utilize AI/ChatGPT. The University of Michigan University Law School bans ChatGPT in law school applications. In contrast, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law allows law school applicants to use ChatGPT in their law school applications, including in their personal statements. Arizona State’s law school requires that law school applicants must disclose if they used AI tools, similar to the requirement to acknowledge if they used a professional consultant.

 Interestingly, Troy Lowry, Senior Vice President of Technology Products at lsac.org, compared law school applicants’ personal statements with the proctored, timed LSAT writing samples written by the same students. Lowry found that “AI managed to predict correctly better than two-thirds of the time whether the author was the same or not and provided reasons to support its predictions.”

Therefore, what are the best practices for a law school applicant regarding the issue of using ChatGPT?

First, an applicant should always review and follow the policy regarding use of ChatGPT for each law school to which the student is applying. Secondly, and most importantly, understand that your personal statement, written by you as opposed to ChatGPT, will be more authentic because it is your unique story. Your personal statement will allow the law school admissions committee to understand, and remember, the real you.

Just imagine, if Taylor Swift chose ChatGPT to write her songs instead of writing her own songs, would Billboard Magazine be announcing that Taylor Swift now holds the all-time record for the most #1 hits on Billboard’s Pop Radio Chart?