Skip to content

Center for Law, Engagement, and Politics

Leap At SHSU!

  • About LEAP
  • LEAP Ambassadors
Center for Law, Engagement, and Politics

Category: Law

Edwin Bell Talks DEI with CRIJ and CMIT

Two years ago, the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) made a decision that they needed approach to diversifying courts across the country. They created a new position–Director of Racial Equity, Fairness, and Inclusion–and they hired Bell to “address racial equality in the justice system.” And, today, owing to a partnership between CRIJ’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Office and the Correctional Management Institute of Texas (CMIT), Bell spoke to faculty, staff and students at SHSU.

Introduced by Nu Epps, CJ’s Director of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion…

…Bell got to the point quickly, discussing a “Blueprint” for a new justice system. This change begins with awareness, requires institutional (and institutionalized) change, is expanded by new processes, and is nourished by recruiting justice-system actors from a cross-section of the United States.

These changes can range from being aware of our biases, includes modifications of how we treat people in the justice system, and extends to the manner in which we target opportunities. One of these opportunities, which will be unveiled fully within the year, is C.O.R.A, which involves targeting minority-serving institutions for internships, clerkships, and positions within the criminal justice system.

Bell is well positioned to assess many of these changes. With a Bachelors Degree in Criminal Justice, a Master’s in Business Administration, a Certificate in Judicial Administration from Michigan State University, and a graduate of the NCSC Court Management Fellows program. He has also worked in the court system for more than a decade, serving as judicial administrator, clerk, and as a planner for the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council of Georgia.

Bell’s experience, wisdom, and inspirational message influenced at least one student in the audience. Kiara Williams, a senior Criminal Justice major at SHSU, noted that it was “an uplifting talk, and it opened me up to some opportunities I had not considered.”

Following the event, Bell spent time speaking with audience members, encouraging students (including Williams), and discussing potential future partnerships–before being whisked away to his next opportunity to spread a message of fairness and awareness.

Unknown's avatarAuthor mikeyawnPosted on October 19, 2022Format AsideCategories Civic Engagement, Civil Rights, Law, PoliticsTags Center for Law Engagement And Politics, Criminal Justice, Diversity & Inclusion, LEAP Ambassadors, Sam Houston State UniversityLeave a comment on Edwin Bell Talks DEI with CRIJ and CMIT

A NOLA Adventure: Day 1

Oct. 13, 2022, Jessica Cuevas 

PCAC Session 1 

After a long drive Wednesday evening to Louisiana, we were up and early to attend our first Academic Conference – The Popular Culture Association in the South! The three presenters for the Film and Noir session were Professor Yawn, Matthew Wysocki of Flagler College, and Lauren Mitchell of Vanderbilt. 

Professor Yawn presented over “A Simple Plan,” directed by Sam Raini, (most famously known for the Evil Dead movies).

He argued that the film is best understood by looking at it from a tragic framework, with questions of free will and fate, the allure of the American dream at its center, and the tension between brothers.

The motif of “brotherhood” is seen again in “Only God forgives,” which Matthew Wysocki addressed in his presentation. More elaborately, though, it addresses the role of mother. Crystal, an untraditional mother if ever there was one, uses manipulation and raw power to gain even more power, abandoning all of what would normally be regarded as traditional maternal behavior.

Lauren Mitchell presented her paper over the movie “Hereditary. ” This film continues the theme of motherhood, highlighting the difficult time we have of seeing mothers as real people, who sometimes becomes mothers despite not wanting children, who sacrifice goals and hopes and dreams for others.

We successfully survived, and even enjoyed our first academic conference, and embarked on our way to our next stop! 

Brunch at Elizabeth’s

Ashley Kinyon

This afternoon, we drove down to Elizabeth’s Restaurant  right next to the Mississippi River. We started with an assortment of appetizers; boudin balls, fried green tomatoes, (some with seafood!), and possibly the strangest of the bunch, praline bacon. While we waited for the starters, we learned that many foods that we love in the US originated in New Orleans, either by invention or through trade. This includes pralines, which originated in France, but which was improved on in New Orleans, and then spread mostly through the South.

My favorite of the selection was the boudin balls, Morgan favored the fried green tomatoes, and for Yvette it was the praline bacon. 

To maximize on adventure and try new (to us) flavors, we ordered four main dishes. For our main course, Morgan and Victoria ordered the shrimp and grits; the ratio of shrimp and grits was perfect.  

Jessica played it safe with the avocado toast, with a poached egg. Although to her credit, the toast did have some NOLA spice to it, and she paired it with a side of grits. 

Yvette chose the duck waffles, which she enjoyed but deemed too spicy, a recurring motif throughout the trip (and from what I gathered, throughout her life).

I picked the sweet meal out of the bunch and had banana foster French toast, which was delicious!

For dessert, we had bread pudding and pecan pie. The bread pudding was average, not the table’s favorite, but the pecan pie was amazing, better than any I’ve had in Texas.

Thoroughly stuffed and with high expectations for our next NOLA meal, we embarked on our adventure!

Homer Plessy

With a bit of downtime, we hustled over to a City Park, one highlighting civil rights. It was the site of Homer Plessy’s train ride, where he spurred a test case on Jim Crow laws.

Unfortunately, Plessy lost in 1896, and the doctrine of “Separate but Equal” became shameful precedent in the US, not replaced until 1954’s Brown v. Board of Education.

While at the Plessy site, we also looked over the rest of the park, taking in some of NOLA’s civil rights heroes.

Zooming through NOLA 

Yvette Mendoza

We have concluded over three separate LEAP trips that there is no better way to learn more about a new city than by Segway, and we did just that in NOLA! Our excellent tour guide, John, with Nation Tours did a great job explaining the richness of history, architecture, and culture in New Orleans. So as the LEAP Ambassadors took their Segways through the French Quarter to the Mississippi River, we all gained a deeper understanding of NOLA. 

John frequently time-traveled and described what the city was like in days past. Some of the tour was a refresher on previous history lessons, while other parts were new information. We learned that NOLA went through 4 major governing shifts. The city was initially founded by the French, taken over by the Spanish, fell again under French rule, and then finally doubled the size of the U.S. in 1803 with the Louisiana Purchase. 

Next, we headed to Jackson Square. This central location is deemed such because of the “Hero of New Orleans,” Andrew Jackson, and his unexpected victory as General at the Battle of New Orleans in early 1815. This was a major win for the United States because it spared the US the prospect of the British having control over the mouth of the Mississippi. 

Perhaps the prime feature of Jackson Square must be the stunning, almost 300-year-old, St. Louis Cathedral. This Cathedral is one of the oldest in the country and was founded during Spanish occupation!

Our jaws dropped when we discovered we were stepping in front of the oldest Cathedral. We could not miss a photo opportunity! 

Up next, Bourbon Street! Here we learned more about the Spanish stock architecture and the fantastic bars that perform the best jazz in New Orleans. this blend of modern-day culture, with historic surroundings is the city’s largest source of revenue Pre-covid, NOLA saw millions of tourists each year, and now those numbers are significantly lower. In fact, without tourists, there is genuinely no thriving NOLA since no revenue is being made. 

No matter your age, interests, taste, there is something to be found by everyone in NOLA! 

New Orleans felt like its own country. The way the people, location, and everything else are something we are not used to. We are so grateful we were able to learn so much on the Segway Tour guided by John; thank you so much! 

Dinner at Oceana 

Morgan Robertson

To conclude our evening, we stopped at the corner of Conti and Bourbon for yet another taste of NOLA. Oceana is popular for having a wide variety of NOLA standards, such as oysters, po’boys, and étouffée to name just a few. 

To start, we stuck with our trend of an assortment of appetizers including, gator tail bites, boudin balls, fresh, Rockefeller oysters, and chargrilled oysters. For Ashley and me, this was our first time to try oysters and we had slightly different reactions. Ashley tried the Rockefeller oysters and determined they were not her favorite. I tried all three and enjoyed the Rockefeller the most! Everyone enjoyed the boudin balls, and we all agreed that alligator tastes a lot like chicken.

For our main meals, we once again mimicked family style, and tried many new flavors. Victoria and I split a blackened redfish, with a side of greens, Yvette and Jessica ventured out with the taste of New Orleans (creole jambalaya, crawfish étouffée, red beans and rice with smoked sausage), Ashley had the fried shrimp platter, and Professor Yawn and Stephanie split the Bayou Duck. 

Verdicts were split on what the best entrée was, but at least three out of seven favored the blackened redfish. The flavors were once again unique but fantastic, a trip to NOLA could be made simply for the food. 

Despite having little room for dessert (except for Stephanie because she effectively planned) we selected three options carrot cake, la boehme crème brule, and of course, bread pudding. The bread pudding was easily the favorite, but everyone enjoyed the sweet treats to end our wonderful meal! 

Bourbon Street

We might have seen Bourbon St. during the day, but it was almost a completely new place after dark. Our steps fell in time to the bass of the music around us, and it almost felt like a runway with the flashing lights. If it is true that anyone can find something on Bourbon St, it’s even more true at night. Being only a Thursday night, however, we might gone at a slightly better time as it was not insanely busy.

Not wanting to linger on Bourbon Street and needing some sleep, we headed back to our hotels, to get rest for another day of learning and fun tomorrow.

Unknown's avatarAuthor mikeyawnPosted on October 15, 2022Format AsideCategories Civic Engagement, Civil Rights, Law, PoliticsTags Center for Law Engagement And Politics, LEAP Ambassadors, New Orleans, NOLA, Popular Culture Association of the South, Sam Houston State UniversityLeave a comment on A NOLA Adventure: Day 1

A Festival Farewell: Last Day at TTF

Although this was our last day, it was also one we were most anticipating, full of big hitters and topics of particular interest to us.

The Supremes, by Jessica Cuevas

It is not every day that the opportunity to see one-third of the Texas Supreme Court , including the Chief Justice, presents itself. The LEAP Ambassadors were ecstatic to see and hear from the longest serving member of this court, who has been elected seven times, the 27th Chief Justice: Chief Justice Nathan Hecht. We also had a chance to see Justice Brett Busby, who was appointed in February of 2019, and Justice Rebeca Huddle who was appointed in October of 2020.

I had previously taken Dr. John Domino’s online Judicial Systems course, and hearing the Justices speak of their process for choosing a case and who gets to determine who writes the opinion, was an in-person version of his class! Out of all the hundreds of cases that get appealed and that they receive, they only listen and select about 10% of the cases for the docket.

These are usually cases the Justices believe to be important in determining the legal development in Texas. This process can be extensive since each justice reviews the cases on their own and only reconvenes to discuss which cases they would like to cover.

Typically when this occurs, they are unanimous in agreeing on which cases they would like to listen to and which ones they would rather not. For a case to not be heard or selected, two-thirds of the court need to agree that there is no important legal question being asked. If one of the justices disagrees with this decision and would like to advocate for this case, they can explain why it is important at their next meeting. If the case gets four votes then it is granted, hence “the rule of four.” For the most part, this court prides itself on its collegiality since they tend to be in consensus on many of the cases.

I learned that it is not unusual for a dissenting opinion to become the majority opinion after hearing different sides of the issues and finessing the legal ruling, which is an interesting process. Unlike the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), where the Chief Justice gets to choose someone from the majority opinion to write it, the Texas Supreme Court has the justices draw blue index cards that determine the cases they will write. They do this to prevent one justice from being extremely knowledgeable in one area of the law, and so that everyone has a basic understanding of every area.

Yvette even got the chance to ask the Justices what a typical day for them looks like.

Of course, the justices responded by saying that there is no “typical day,” but there are days that they dedicate specifically to just reading, writing, or having hearings. During hearings, the justices like to ask questions to the lawyers so that they can elaborate on the areas where they see gaps to better understand the case they are trying to make and know what direction they are focused on and why. They want to be persuaded.  A member of the audience asked the justices for their thoughts on term limits, to which Chief Hecht responded with how he thought there should not be any for members of the judicial branch since it takes time to develop the experience to become a judge and a good one at that. Funny enough Justice Busby remarked that of course, Chief Justice Hecht would not want term limits, since he is the longest serving member of the court.

One-on-one with Ted Cruz

Morgan Robertson

Staying with TTF’s emphasis on fluidity across the political spectrum, our second session of the day was a one-on-one session with U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, moderated by Senior correspondent at the Washington Examiner, David Drucker.

We noticed that major speakers were typically hosted at the Paramount Theatre. I particularly enjoyed the wonderful venue and the art deco design, perhaps because I work for the Old Town Theatre in Huntsville.

Senator Cruz shared with the audience some of his family history, and more specifically, his father’s process through immigration, which he then compared to today’s immigration process. Senator Cruz gave a vivid description of what the border and the Rio Grande look like today.

Drucker then prompted the topic of his presidential run. Senator Cruz said he looks back on his campaign fondly and enjoyed running for President. Although in 2016 he was not the main target of political attention, Senator Cruz was engaged and deliberate with his campaign.

His comments, and at times his mere presence, seemed to irritate the crowd, many of whom came to simply heckle him. To his credit, Senator Cruz said a few times that he will be more than happy to sit-down and have a conversation with everyone. However, he indicated he would not engage in yelling back and forth across the auditorium is not a conversation. Senator Cruz said in an ideal world, both parties could sit at a table together and strive to find a solution.

When it was time for questions from the audience, the first one was about gun control, and this set the tone for the remainder of the program. The audience strongly disagreed with Cruz, and they let their feelings be known.

Beto is Back

Yvette Mendoza

Beto is a favorite of the Texas Tribune, and we have seen him present at more than one, and each time he is a featured speaker and a crowd favorite. This time was no different, although the office for which he is running is different. Having run for the TX Senate, then for President, he is now running for Governor against Abbott. Beto went into great detail on his history, past experiences running for various elected positions, and what changes he would make if he became the next Governor of Texas.

Beto had an exciting track to becoming a politician from El Paso, Texas; as a dream to become a part of a band, he decided to attend Columbia University in New York. He soon realizes the hectic New York lifestyle was not for him and headed back to El Paso as a businessman. He became more interested in local politics, serving as a council member and being mayor pro tempore. He also was a US House member for six years, before embarking on his failed bids for Senator and President, respectively.

He believes in stricter gun laws, specifically moving the age from 18 to 21 to own an AR-15. Regarding our border crisis, Beto advocates that we need immigrants to work for us, which would ultimately benefit our economy in his eyes. Lastly, he touched on universal health care by opting in on Obamacare’s Medicare program.

We will (likely) know the outcome of Beto’s latest bid by the end of the night on November 8!

Public Health Sessions

Ashlyn Parker

I got to venture on my own a bit on this last day of the festival and go to some sessions that specifically piqued my interest. The most impactful event I went to was named “Reality Bites,” which featured a panel that discussed trust in science. The panel consisted of Andrew Dessler, Jehmu Greene, Jennifer Mercieca, and Allison Stewart and was narrated by John Schwartz.

Jennifer Mercieca spoke compellingly about how she and her dad would watch television news together when she was young. Today, however, with programming and advertising often working off algorithms, she and her dad watch very few of the same programs. The news today pushes for reactions, often by appealing to those who already agree with them.

The panel collectively agreed that Republican propaganda has been increasing for years, and its effects are now quite obvious. By 2020, when the pandemic hit, the George Floyd riots were pervasive, and the outcome of the 2020 election tilted Democratic, Republicans were left trusting few media figures and even fewer federal government officials–with the exception, of course, of President Trump.

Allison Stewart, a public health information analyst, discussed how the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded differently than previous health scares. In the past, the facts have largely spoken for themselves, and those facts would prompt people to get vaccinated or take precautions, but that didn’t happen in 2020–in fact, resistance to this has morphed into a full-blown anti-science agenda.

_____________________________________________

I missed the first LEAP event with Dr. Peter Hotez, Dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, but thankfully I was able to hear him speak on COVID-19 with Dr. Celine Gounder, who served on the Biden-Harris COVID-19 Advisory Board. The session was narrated by the CEO of the Texas Tribune, Evan Smith.

Peter Hotez, being an expert in vaccines, spoke highly of vaccine efforts, but he does not fully agree with mandatory vaccines. Dr. Grounder was also somewhat critical of the CDC for not communicating the airborne nature of the disease. She believed think the mask mandates helped save lives.

Overall, I had a chance to hear from inspiring figures in public health and communications, which appeals to me greatly as a Public Health major. Both of the sessions focused on miscommunication and disinformation in the media, and they both emphasized that the media–and their algorithms–are as much to blame as the people who refuse to see facts.

Liz Cheney

Morgan Robertson

As a fantastic conclusion to the night, we once again took our seats in Paramount Theatre to hear from the closing speaker. Wyoming Representative, Liz Cheney, took the stage to a standing ovation.

Congresswoman Cheney has had an extensive career as an attorney and as an employee of the State Department. She has served as Wyoming’s lone congressperson since her win in 2019 and will remain in congress until January.

Although she is a Republican, she does not shy away from speaking out against certain members of the party, especially Former President Donald Trump. Congresswoman Cheney credits this as the reason for her loss during the Republican primaries.

Congresswoman Cheney is Vice Chair on the House Select Committee to investigate the Attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6. Most of the conversation centered around Evan Smith asking questions relating to the attack, and Congresswoman Cheney disclosing little. She did describe that the members on the committee decided to operate slightly differently than typical committee hearings. Instead of giving each member 5 minutes during a hearing, the committee has split the hearings up so that two or three members are given the time needed to examine evidence.

Smith then asked the Congresswoman a very straightforward question, that I’m sure many in the audience wanted to ask as well: “Will you run for President?” She avoided giving an answer, which in turn led to another question. Smith phrased the question in such a way that hinted to her recent loss of her seat, and how will she keep fighting. Congresswoman Cheney assured the crowd that even though she is no longer going to be a congresswoman, she is certainly not going anywhere and will continue to put her country first.

Indian Cuisine

Yvette Mendoza

To finish off a great day of new experiences, we were able to add to the list an Indian restaurant called Asiana Indian Cuisine.

With the entrees, our waiter highly recommended ‘the bullet,’ which was nan bread with jalapenos that may have been a little too spicy for us but still very tasty. Our favorite had to have been chicken 65, cubes marinated in spices. Having the assorted platter of samosa, spring rolls, reshmo kabobs, and keema samosa it was delicious.

Next up were entrees from the vegetable saag paneer, having a blend of cottage cheese and spinach, chicken tikka masala with a creamy tomato butter sauce, and the butter chicken!

Professor Yawn returned to an authentic traditional dish by getting the curry chicken.

Lastly, for dessert, we had carrot halwa, which was not a favorite, but we did enjoy the Zauq-E-Shah. This was a great way to top off our day!

Unknown's avatarAuthor mikeyawnPosted on October 8, 2022October 8, 2022Format AsideCategories Civic Engagement, Law, PoliticsTags Austin, Center for Law Engagement And Politics, Nathan Hecht, Peter Hotez, Sam Houston State University, Texas Tribune FestivalLeave a comment on A Festival Farewell: Last Day at TTF

The Texas Tribune Festival–the LEAP Way

Austin, Texas, Day 2: Friday, September 23, 2022

Following an eventful first day of interviews and new connections, the LEAP Ambassadors were excited to hit the ground running with the 2022 Texas Tribune Festival!

Texas State Capitol

Jessica Cuevas

Our Friday morning began with a trip to the Texas Capitol, where we met with the Chief of Staff for Senator Bryan Hughes, Cody Terry. (Senator Hughes represents the Tyler area, where Morgan is from!) During our time with Mr. Terry, we got a surprise visit from Senator Charles Schwertner’s former Chief of Staff, Tom Holloway. We were also lucky enough to meet Caroline Harris, who, after winning the primary (congratulations!), will compete in the general election for her own seat!

Between welcomed and insightful interruptions, Mr. Terry shared a few words of wisdom regarding internships applicable to any office.

He advised us to find something we are interested in and run with it.

We also met with Scott Jenkines, Chief of Staff for Representative Armando “Mando” Martinez who represents the Valley (District 39). Mr. Jenkines gave us a more technical overview of the innerworkings of the Texas House.

From both chiefs we learned about how different offices and committees work, and what members look for and expect from interns. We were grateful to have been able to sneak some questions in, and we  are very thankful for the opportunity to have met with them and learn more about the legislative session. It was a great start for our day, which we soon followed with a trek down to the Paramount Theatre for our second Texas Tribune Festival session!

Hillary Clinton[FS1] 

Yvette Mendoza

This session was actually two-pronged. We had the opportunity to experience Austin’s stunning Paramount Theatre, a historic Art Deco structure built in 1915.

The second was, of course, the session topic: a One-on-One with former Secretary of State and 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, moderated by Kara Swisher!

Our main takeaway from Hillary Clinton was her stance on empowering women in politics. This was perfect for all four of us since we had just left the Capitol, where we all hope to intern in the next session..

With empowerment comes controversial issues, and in her talk, it was clear the most popular topic was her 2016 run against Donald Trump for President. He was a central topic of discussion, specifically regarding the deleted emails, predictions for future elections, and the possible criminal charges he may face.

Clinton repeatedly emphasized that she did not delete any emails and “never corresponded about classified emails.” Clinton has raised money in an interesting, but slightly self-deprecating way, by selling hats that read “But Her Emails.” [FS2] Clinton and Swisher laughed about the merch, but on a more serious note, each dollar raised from the hats is donated to the next Democratic candidate for the next presidential election.

Although she will not be running for office in the future, Clinton still contributes much to the current political officials in the Democratic party. When the question was raised if Trump is likely to run again, Clinton predicted he will run again, although this time he may also have criminal charges pending, after the search of Mar-a-Lago.

Aside from the political drama, Clinton vocalized the importance of Social Security, Medicare, and having a strong social democracy. She believes this will happen only if we continue to vote Democrats into office. But whether or not you are a Democrat or a Republican, we must vote and empower one another. Hearing from Hillary Clinton showed us that you can overcome what may seem to be impossible—an excellent takeaway!

Previewing the 88th: Part Four

Ashlyn Parker

TTF hosts multiple  sessions about the upcoming Texas Legislative Session. Although we beelined it to Raise Your Hand Texas, where the fourth session was held, many others had the same idea, and we ended up in the SRO section. Nonetheless, it was completely worth it.

The impressive panel included Senator Carol Alvarado, Senator Cesar Blanco, Senator Sarah Eckhardt, Democratic Candidate for Senate District 27 Morgan LaMantia, and moderator Matthew Watkins, Managing Editor for News and Politics at The Texas Tribune. With the State of Texas’ budget surplus of about $30 billion, redistricting, and the Texas governor’s election, this session will definitely face new opportunities and challenges.

Abortion is a heavy topic for discussion during this session, after  the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The panel didn’t suggest that any major bills will pass to restore those rights, but they would like to pass legislation to allow for certain exceptions of abortions like incest, rape, or medical complications. For example, Texas has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the country, so adopting legislation that will protect the mother’s life from risk of a full-term pregnancy could lower that statistic. Senator Blanco expects this upcoming governor’s election to be a “Roe-vember,” implying that many voters will vote solely driven by their beliefs or stance on abortion.

 

Another topic this panel expects will be up for much debate is gun regulations. Although gun regulations have been debated for decades, what makes the topic so complicated for this upcoming session is the increase in school shootings, specifically the Uvalde school shooting. Many people are fed up with turning on the news to another school shooting where innocent lives have been lost, and voters will be letting their legislators know that. The panel hopes to see stricter gun laws passed to help stop gun violence in Texas, which has a higher gun mortality rate than the national average.  There was a call to action to the right to place more emphasis on the gun laws in Texas.

The panel also mentioned plans to focus on other issues that were “not just political stunts,” such as lowering property taxes and fixing the worker shortage, specifically for teachers and nurses.

One topic the panel did consider a political stunt wasthe border wall. The panel understands Republicans’ concern, but they do not like the way the Republican party goes about it. They would like to focus on improving the treatment of the immigrants coming in and not just throwing them into state camps or foster care. We were informed by the panel that some of these kids being thrown under state custody are dying due to the living conditions they are being put under at the border camps. Right now, the quality of care is improving due to neighboring border city communities that take kids in and provide them with better conditions, so the senators would like to see a change in that sector. 

With (hopefully) our internships for this upcoming session, we found this discussion impactful and inspiring. We always enjoy getting to hear different points of views, so it will be great to ponder on these ideas until January!

40 North

Jessica Cuevas

Following a busy day, we met up with SHSU alumna (and former LEAP Center student worker), Annie Jamarik, Chief of Staff for Representative Hugh Shine. Annie recommended a great local pizza joint, called 40 North.

Considering Annie’s recommendations, we ordered the Classic Pepperoni (a bit spicy), the Margherita Di Bufala, the Barbe, and probably (most) everyone’s favorite, the Hot Honey.

As we ate, Annie gave us sound advice, both from the perspective of an intern and as a chief. She advised us to build our networks early and joked that we have already started with her! Along with her encouraging advice, she also had some practical advice, too. We asked about wardrobe and best places to shop, and even what kinds of shoes to wear every day.

We are very thankful to Annie for joining us for a great dinner and for all her advice and words of wisdom about interning in this upcoming session at the Capitol.


Unknown's avatarAuthor mikeyawnPosted on October 7, 2022Format AsideCategories Civic Engagement, Food, Law, PoliticsTags Center for Law Engagement And Politics, LEAP Ambassadors, Sam Houston State University, SHAIP, Texas Tribune FestivalLeave a comment on The Texas Tribune Festival–the LEAP Way

TribFest 2022–A LEAP Adventure

Austin, Texas, Friday, September 23, 2022

Following an eventful first day of interviews and new connections, the LEAP Ambassadors were excited to hit the ground running with the 2022 Texas Tribune Festival!

Featuring Hillary Clinton

Yvette Mendoza

This session was actually two-pronged. We had the opportunity to experience Austin’s stunning Paramount Theatre, a historic Art Deco structure built in 1915.

The second was, of course, the session topic: a One-on-One with former Secretary of State and 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, moderated by Kara Swisher!

Our main takeaway from Hillary Clinton was her stance on empowering women in politics. This was perfect for all four of us since we had just left the Capitol, where we all hope to intern in the next session..

With empowerment comes controversial issues, and in her talk, it was clear the most popular topic was her 2016 run against Donald Trump for President. He was a central topic of discussion, specifically regarding his accusation against her of deleted emails, predictions for future elections, and possible criminal charges he may face.

Clinton repeatedly emphasized that she did not delete any emails and “never corresponded about classified emails.” Clinton has raised money in an interesting, but slightly self-deprecating way, by selling hats that read “But Her Emails.” [FS2] Clinton and Swisher laughed about the merch, but on a more serious note, each dollar raised from the hats is donated to the next Democratic candidate for the next presidential election.

Although she will not be running for office at any point in the future, Clinton still contributes much to the current political officials in the Democratic party. When the question was raised if Trump is likely to run again, Clinton predicted he will run again, although this time he may also have criminal charges pending, after the invasion of Mar-a-Lago.

Aside from the political drama, Clinton vocalized the importance of Social Security, Medicare, and having a strong social democracy. She believes this will happen only if we continue to vote democrats into office. But whether or not you are a democrat or a republican, we must vote and empower one another. Hearing from Hillary Clinton showed us that you can overcome what may seem to be impossible—an excellent takeaway!

Previewing the 88th: Part Four

Ashlyn Parker

TTF hosts multiple  sessions about the upcoming Texas Legislative Session. Although we beelined it to Raise Your Hand Texas…

…where the fourth session was held, many others had the same idea, and we ended up in the SRO section. It was completely worth it.

The impressive panel included Senator Carol Alvarado, Senator Cesar Blanco, Senator Sarah Eckhardt, Democratic Candidate for Senate District 27 Morgan LaMantia, and moderator Matthew Watkins, Managing Editor for News and Politics at The Texas Tribune. With the State of Texas’ budget surplus of about $30 billion, redistricting, and the Texas governor’s election, this session will definitely face new opportunities and challenges.

Abortion is a heavy topic for discussion during this session, after  the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The panel didn’t suggest that any major bills will pass to restore those rights, but they would like to pass legislation to allow for certain exceptions of abortions like incest, rape, or medical complications. For example, Texas has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the country, so adopting legislation that will protect the mother’s life from risk of a full-term pregnancy could lower that statistic. Senator Blanco expects this upcoming governor’s election to be a “Roe-vember,” implying that many voters will vote solely driven by their beliefs or stance on abortion. 

Another topic this panel expects will be up for much debate is gun regulations. Although gun regulations have been debated for decades, what makes the topic so complicated for this upcoming session is the increase in school shootings, specifically the Uvalde school shooting. Many people are fed up with turning on the news to another school shooting where innocent lives have been lost, and voters will be letting their legislators know that. The panel hopes to see stricter gun laws passed to help stop gun violence in Texas, which has a higher gun mortality rate than the national average.  There was a call to action to the right to place more emphasis on the gun laws in Texas.

The panel also mentioned plans to focus on other issues that were “not just political stunts,” such as lowering property taxes and fixing the worker shortage, specifically for teachers and nurses.

One topic that they do consider a political stunt is the border wall. The panel understands republicans’ concern, but they do not like the way the Republican party goes about it. They would like to focus on improving the treatment of the immigrants coming in and not just throwing them into state camps or foster care. We were informed by the panel that some of these kids being thrown under state custody are dying due to the living conditions they are being put under at the border camps. Right now, the quality of care is improving due to neighboring border city communities that take kids in and provide them with better conditions, so the senators would like to see a change in that sector. 

With (hopefully) our internships for this upcoming session, we found this discussion impactful and inspiring. We always enjoy getting to hear different points of views, so it will be great to ponder on these ideas until January!

Meeting With an Alum

In between sessions, we also ran into a LEAP Alum–Christina Gonzalez. Ms. Gonzales works for the Association of Electric Companies of Texas, and her office is located in the same building as one of our sessions. She was able to give us a tour of her office space, while also showing us the gorgeous view of the capitol and providing advice for the upcoming session!

40 North

Jessica Cuevas

Following a busy day, we met up with SHSU alumna (and former LEAP Center student worker), Annie Jamarik, Chief of Staff for Representative Hugh Shine. Annie recommended a great local pizza joint, called 40 North.

Considering Annie’s recommendations, we ordered the Classic Pepperoni (a bit spicy), the Margherita Di Bufala, the Barbe, and probably (most) everyone’s favorite, the Hot Honey.

As we ate, Annie gave us sound advice, both from the perspective of an intern and as a chief. She advised us to build our networks early and joked that we have already started with her! Along with her encouraging advice, she also had some practical advice, too. We asked about wardrobe and best places to shop, and even what kinds of shoes to wear every day.

We are very thankful to Annie for joining us for a great dinner and for all her advice and words of wisdom about interning in this upcoming session at the Capitol.


Unknown's avatarAuthor mikeyawnPosted on October 2, 2022Format AsideCategories Civic Engagement, Law, PoliticsTags Center for Law Engagement And Politics, Hillary Clinton, LEAP Ambassadors, Paramount Theatre, Sam Houston State University, Texas Legislature, Texas Tribune Festival, Tribfest22Leave a comment on TribFest 2022–A LEAP Adventure

September Elections for Pre-Law Society

Our first members-only meeting of the Fall occurred last week…

…and it was an important: we held elections for President, Secretary, VP of Membership, and Historian. Thankfully, some of these things were taken care of by “game-time,” as the races for President and Secretary were uncontested.

By acclamation, then, Yvette Mendoza was elected President, and Jasmine Crooks elected Secretary. From this point on, Yvette took over as the presiding officer of the meeting.

For Vice-President of Membership, we had three candidates: Jesus Ayala, Jacelin Daniels, and Angela Moreno. Each were given three minutes to discuss their reasons for running, and they all did well.

Following this race, the candidates for Historian took over, with Stone Lambeth and Mckenna Nonnenmann followed. Again, both did well.

While discussions about upcoming events took place–including next week’s visit by Texas Tech Law School–the students voted and the officers waited, patiently.

With a record number of 85 students in attendance, the counting took a while, but when the dust had settled and the votes were counted, we were able to name Jacelin Daniel as VP of Membership and Mckenna Nonnenmann (a freshman!).

The meeting then soon ended, with a group photo of the Fall 2022 officers (including returning VP of Finance, Emily Albright), and many good things to come!

We would like to thank all the candidates, successful and unsuccessful, for their effort to contribute to the Pre-Law Society.

Unknown's avatarAuthor mikeyawnPosted on September 25, 2022September 26, 2022Format AsideCategories Civic Engagement, LawTags Center for Law Engagement And Politics, LEAP Center, Pre-Law Society, Sam Houston State UniversityLeave a comment on September Elections for Pre-Law Society

Watergate: 50 Years Later

It may have been 50 years since the Watergate story, and many young people may not know much about the scandal, but it is one that still reverberates across history. And, with questions of classified documents in the wrong hands, destruction of evidence, and financial wrongdoings still swirling in the news, the lessons of Watergate are more timely than ever.

Thus it was that Professor Yawn and I embarked on a panel moderated by Evan Smith and featuring Garret Graff, author of Watergate: A New History. For me, not knowing much about Watergate, it was quite the learning experience. According to Graff, Watergate wasn’t a single scandal: it was a series of scandals, and, in fact, the Watergate break-in was just (more or less) the last among several illegal and unethical decisions made by the Nixon team.

Many of these are only understandable as part of the larger picture. Here’s an example: As far as history can fully demonstrate, Nixon only ordered one break-in. It was to the Brookings Institution, and it was never pulled off. The motivation for such an act was that Nixon believed that Brookings possessed evidence of a prior wrongdoing. By blowing up the Institution, he could destroy the evidence (assuming it wasn’t copied).

What followed was an outlandish plan involving guys dressed as fireman going into the building, setting up explosives, and driving away in a firetruck as the explosion occurred. What squelched the plan, according to Graff, was not its illegality, but the cost of a used firetruck.

Many comparisons were made to the Trump administration. To Graff, there are several key distinctions in the aftermath: (1) key Republicans (e.g., Howard Baker, George H.W. Bush, and Barry Goldwater) confronted Nixon about his wrongdoing, and encouraged him to step down for the good of the country; and (2) Nixon went away.

Also of interest was Graff’s discussion of how much the movie All the President’s Men impacted our understanding of history and politics. He says many Americans were disappointed when “Deep Throat” was finally revealed in 2005, and the real-life character, Mark Felt, didn’t look more like Hal Holbrook. Also, Jason Robards, who portrayed WAPO Editor Ben Bradlee in the film, would tap his ring finger on the table or other surfaces. That was his invention, not something Bradlee actually did. That is, until Bradlee saw the film. After seeing Robards tap his ring finger, Bradlee adopted the mannerism!

The cast of All the President’s Men–and their real-life counterparts

Graff lingered after the session, answering questions and discussing his book with the audience members. I met “Dr. Janice,” and she and got photos with Mr. Graff!

And, with the ominous lessons of Watergate in mind, we headed off to hear more about politics and the media at the Texas Tribune Festival, more aware than ever of contemporary parallels to historical precedent.

Unknown's avatarAuthor mikeyawnPosted on September 24, 2022Format AsideCategories Civic Engagement, Law, PoliticsTags AustinTX, Center for Law Engagement And Politics, Garrett Graff, LEAP Ambassadors, Sam Houston State University, SHSU, Texas Tribune FestivalLeave a comment on Watergate: 50 Years Later

A Walk Through Korean-US Relations

Morgan Robertson

For the LEAP Ambassadors, there is no better mid-week venture than to the Glades Art Foundation in the Woodlands for an always amazing World Affairs Council event. This time around, we were fortunate enough to be accompanied by two guests: Hongjin Jeon, (aka. Andrew) a student in Professor Yawn’s Texas Government class and Dr. Lei Duan, the professor for my Modern Asian History course.  

We enjoyed pursuing the current exhibits on display, one of which we have seen before: a collection of drinks!

The Glade Gallery hosts an array of exhibits as well as acts as a meeting location for many local groups. The Woodlands Photography Club was also hosting a meeting and they were surrounded by many dynamic photographs. 

The event began with an introduction from Ray Cunningham, the North Houston Coordinator, who thanked the Glade Gallery, and the guests for their continued interest in the Council.

Mr. Cunningham then introduced Professor Yawn…

…who proceeded to introduce General In-Bum Chun.

Professor Yawn highlighted General Chun’s career in both the military and governmental sectors…

…and a few of his acts of service, which later General Chun elaborated on. 

General Chun began by recognizing and expressing his gratitude for one of the audience members, Charles, A Korean War Veteran! It was wonderful to see this man, who must have been nearing 90, hear about an expert on Korea, seven decades after he fought for South Korea’s right to remain independent and free.

General Chun then spoke on the importance of the United States involvement in the Korean War, (1950-1953) more specifically, American troops on the ground in Korea. Chun stated, that without help from America Korea would not be where they are economically, politically, and socially today.

He then gave 5 key features about Korea that have been made possible by the U.S. 

  1. Reforestation: after the war, the whole peninsula was a barren war zone. Now, Korea has some of the lushest forests in the world. 
  2. International travel: Korea has one of the most accepted passports in the world. 
  3. Healthcare: General Chun highlighted the benefits of universal health care, including regular preventive health checks. 
  4. Public Transportation: The public transportation system is almost on par with the one in Japan. 
  5. Public Restrooms: General Chun noted, slightly jokingly, that when you must go, you don’t have to look far! Everywhere in Korea there are accessible, clean restrooms. 

Ronan O’Malley then stepped as the world-class moderator that he is, and he asked a series of questions of his own and from the audience. In response, General Chun described Korea’s relationship with its surrounding neighbors.

Most of the country’s trade is done with China, although it is extremely difficult to navigate. With their neighbor to the east, there is deeply rooted emotional history. Japan and Korea have made great strides to reconcile, but politicians from both countries capitalize on the bad blood for political gain.

For the other country that shares the peninsula, General Chun Described North Korea as “a perfect dictatorship based on a cult.” The whole country is run by one family and, socially, still operates based on a hierarchal system. 

Often tying historical aspects of the country to modern topics, General Chun concluded the night with one piece of advice: communication. General Chun pointed out that historically there is a lack of communication coming from America. Often we do what is in our interests, without asking the opinions of our allies. General Chun’s advice to keep communication in mind applies to much more than international relations and is sound advice for everyone. 

I strongly admire the way General Chun was able to identify an area that has potential for growth in the U.S, but also express his gratitude for what is arguably one of the best alliances in history. 

As the event drew to a close, we were able to meet with General Chun in groups. The Lonestar Honors Organization was on hand, and we had a chance to talk with them, and also photograph them with the General.

We also had a chance to meet high-school students from Caney Creek, with their advisor Eric Tanner, and they, of course, had a chance to meet with the General.

And, of course, we had a chance to meet with the General as well…

…and this was probably the biggest treat for Andrew.

On behalf of the LEAP center, thank you to the World Affairs Council for always hosting informative and enjoyable events, and to General Chun for taking the time to share your expertise about your country. 

Dinner at Saigon USA Pho Grill

Our goal is always to reinforce the formal knowledge we receive from the presentation with some cultural learning in the form of food. While we couldn’t find Korean food in The Woodlands, we were able to stay close to Korea in a geographical sense, and we had an amazing dinner at Saigon USA pho & grill! 

We started with an assortment of appetizers: Cheese puffs, steamed dumplings, and fried wontons. My favorite was the steamed dumplings, but all of the appetizers where amazing.

For entrées, some half of us chose Pho, and the other half chose meat and rice dishes. 

Everyone loved their meals, and we left almost no room for dessert! Because Tuesday was Yvette’s birthday, Professor Yawn, let Yvette pick the dessert, and she chose Strawberry and Mango mochi. The mochi was plated beautifully, and everyone enjoyed the sweet treat! 

Unknown's avatarAuthor mikeyawnPosted on September 16, 2022May 5, 2023Format AsideCategories Art, Civic Engagement, Food, Law, PoliticsTags Center for Law Engagement And Politics, General In Bum Chun, LEAP Ambassadors, Sam Houston State University, World Affairs Council HoustonLeave a comment on A Walk Through Korean-US Relations

Posts pagination

Previous page Page 1 … Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 … Page 44 Next page

LEAP Ambassadors Are Involved!

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Follow Us On Facebook!

Follow Us On Facebook!

Catch Up With Us

  • Chamber After Hours Showcases Senior Center’s Vital Programs April 24, 2026
  • Building Future Leaders: Lessons from TX Supreme Court Justice James Sullivan April 23, 2026
  • Ambassador Rahul Chhabra speaks on India’s Global Leadership April 21, 2026
  • Mortar & Pestle Brings Joy and Jean Becker April 20, 2026
  • Remembering You, David Adickes April 17, 2026

Join The Conversation!

Multi-Platform Media… on Fun and Flavor: Chilly at the…
Highlights from the… on Glazing-A-Trail with Lauren…
The Civic Leadership… on Foundational Activities of the…
The Civic Leadership… on The Philosophical Foundations…
LEAPing Into Action… on The Philosophical Foundations…

Find Previous Posts

We also have Twitter!

My Tweets

LEAPing Into LEARNing

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

  • About LEAP
  • LEAP Ambassadors
Center for Law, Engagement, and Politics Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Center for Law, Engagement, and Politics
    • Join 490 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Center for Law, Engagement, and Politics
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...